首页> 外文OA文献 >First medical contact in patients with STEMI and its impact on time to diagnosis : an explorative cross-sectional study
【2h】

First medical contact in patients with STEMI and its impact on time to diagnosis : an explorative cross-sectional study

机译:STEMI患者的首次医疗接触及其对诊断时间的影响:一项探索性横断面研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE: It is unknown into what extent patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) utilise a joint service number (Swedish Healthcare Direct, SHD) as first medical contact (FMC) instead of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and how this impact time to diagnosis. We aimed to (1) describe patients' FMC; (2) find explanatory factors influencing their FMC (ie, EMS and SHD) and (3) explore the time interval from symptom onset to diagnosis. SETTING: Multicentred study, Sweden. METHODS: Cross-sectional, enrolling patients with consecutive STEMI admitted within 24 h from admission. RESULTS: We included 109 women and 336 men (mean age 66±11 years). Although 83% arrived by ambulance to the hospital, just half of the patients (51%) called EMS as their FMC. Other utilised SHD (21%), contacted their primary healthcare centre (14%), or went directly to the emergency room (14%). Reasons for not contacting EMS were predominantly; (1) my transport mode was faster (40%), (2) did not consider myself sick enough (30%), and (3) it was easier to be driven or taking a taxi (25%). Predictors associated with contacting SHD as FMC were female gender (OR 1.92), higher education (OR 2.40), history of diabetes (OR 2.10), pain in throat/neck (OR 2.24) and pain intensity (OR 0.85). Predictors associated with contacting EMS as FMC were history of MI (OR 2.18), atrial fibrillation (OR 3.81), abdominal pain (OR 0.35) and believing the symptoms originating from the heart (OR 1.60). Symptom onset to diagnosis time was significantly longer when turning to the SHD instead of the EMS as FMC (1:59 vs 1:21 h, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using other forms of contacts than EMS, significantly prolong delay times, and could adversely affect patient prognosis. Nevertheless, having the opportunity to call the SHD might also, in some instances, lower the threshold for taking contact with the healthcare system, and thus lowers the number that would otherwise have delayed even longer.
机译:目的:尚不清楚ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者在多大程度上利用联合服务号码(Swedish Healthcare Direct,SHD)代替急诊医疗服务(EMS)作为第一医疗联系人(FMC),以及这种影响时间如何诊断。我们旨在(1)描述患者的FMC; (2)找到影响其FMC的解释性因素(即EMS和SHD),以及(3)探索从症状发作到诊断的时间间隔。地点:瑞典的多中心研究。方法:从入院后24小时内入组连续STEMI的入组患者。结果:我们包括109名女性和336名男性(平均年龄66±11岁)。尽管有83%的人通过救护车到达医院,但只有一半的患者(51%)将EMS称为他们的FMC。其他使用SHD的人(21%),联系其主要医疗中心(14%)或直接去急诊室(14%)。不联系EMS的原因主要是; (1)我的交通方式较快(40%),(2)认为自己病得还不够(30%),以及(3)驾车或乘出租车更容易(25%)。与SHD作为FMC接触相关的预测因素是女性(OR 1.92),受过高等教育(OR 2.40),糖尿病史(OR 2.10),咽喉/颈部疼痛(OR 2.24)和疼痛强度(OR 0.85)。与EMS作为FMC接触的相关预测因素包括MI病史(OR 2.18),房颤(OR 3.81),腹痛(OR 0.35)以及认为来自心脏的症状(OR 1.60)。当转向SHD而不是EMS作为FMC时,症状发作的诊断时间明显更长(1:59对1:21 h,p <0.001)。结论:使用除EMS以外的其他形式的联系方式,可显着延长延迟时间,并可能对患者的预后产生不利影响。但是,在某些情况下,有机会致电SHD也可能会降低与医疗保健系统联系的门槛,从而降低原本会延迟更长时间的电话号码。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号